End The Racist War on Drugs

61

By amason1100

Most people believe their body is their "temple" and that they should be able to consume any substance they believe except certain types drugs. These are the drugs which the government has claimed unfit for public consumption. The mass of the public has recognized that alcohol prohibition was failure during the 1920's. State violence against the consumption of this tasty beverage only created a black market environment which led criminal gangs controlling the distribution of alcohol. As a result, of the still continuing consumption of alcohol under prohibition and the government influenced violence that came along with it, the masses had enough and alcohol prohibition was repealed. The unemployed army of anti-alcohol enforcers then turned their eyes to other substances. Government officials and religious figures proclaimed that drugs, like marijuana and cocaine, were said to cause blacks and Mexicans to attack whites. Furthermore, opium was said to cause Asians to exhibit the same behavior. Of course, like then and now , whites consumed more drugs than any other race and every other race is disproportionally imprisoned. The main issue, however, is that drugs should not be illegal in the first place since the act of taking drugs, like alcohol, is not harming anyone but the individual user. Drugs were legal throughout most of our history and there were not bodies littering the streets. The drug war was and continues to be perpetuated by government propaganda and thankfully the American people have been waking up to the fact that the drug war is failure. So, why end the drug war?

1. A massive boost to the economy (Especially in California; a state that needs a boost the most). Marijuana is already a multi-billion dollar industry and it is only legal for medicinal purposes. Imagine the thousands of jobs created by legalizing this relatively harmless plant (compared to alcohol). Even more jobs created when considering legalizing hemp, a plant you can't get high off of, which is used in the production of paper, rope, jewelry, and clothing.

2. Lower crime rates. Crime would obviously plummet since the victimless crimes of drug possession and distribution would no longer be crimes. Violent crimes would also be reduced since the price of drugs would decrease. This would allow addicts to "get their fix" without feeling the need to steal and potentially kill to have enough money to buy the drug. By the way, how often do you here bums killing people for alcohol? With not having to worry about drug-crimes, police could actually spend their time on violent crimes. Consider this an economic boost since billions of dollars would be kept by taxpayers and there will be no more funds confiscated through taxation to pursue drug users and distributors. Prison populations will also decline saving the taxpayer millions and perhaps billions of dollars in the future.

3. Less death. Drugs in a free market equal cleaner drugs. In other words, manufacturers will have access to every type of material that will allow them to give customers with a product that will have less immediate and damaging effects on their physical health. Drug addicts will then have more time to get the available treatment necessary to help kick their habit. Leaving happier families and more people to teach the negative effects drugs have on the person. People should remember the dire effect that poorly made "bathtub gin" had on alcohol consumers which left many people blind or dead.

4. They won't be cool. Most teens get involved with drugs because it is a rebellious activity. Drug use declined substantially in the Netherlands which lead a health official to conclude, "We've succeeded in making drugs not cool anymore".

5. Government would no longer have the legal precedent to regulate everything else we put in our bodies; from raw milk to natural supplements. You know, the stuff that is actually good for you!

Let us reclaim our natural right to treat our "body as our temple" and end the "War on Drugs"!

Ron Paul on the Drug War

Comments

Druid Dude profile image

Druid Dude Level 4 Commenter 4 months ago

Nice one. There are reasons why the drugs that are illegal, are. The pharmaceutical companies don't like marijuana, and the governments concern for us, touching though it is (sarcasm) is offset by the FDA's approval of acceptable drugs which are also as bad for you (and the environment) as the illegal ones, is a bad joke. It all comes down to GREED.

gjfalcone profile image

gjfalcone Level 6 Commenter 4 months ago

I have to agree with Druid Dude on this one. Indeed 'Big Pharma' plays a role but lest we forget 'The Industrial Prison Complex'. The system has surpassed the point of absurdity when the punishment exceeds the crime.

Nice Hub.

L.L. Woodard profile image

L.L. Woodard Level 6 Commenter 4 months ago

Enjoyed reading your thoughts on this topic. Unfortunately, the justice system from the local to the federal level now counts on the money that comes from fining and arresting people.

ib radmasters profile image

ib radmasters 4 months ago

I don't see the RACIST you mention in your title.

amason1100 profile image

amason1100 Hub Author 4 months ago

@ ib radmasters

"Government officials and religious figures proclaimed that drugs, like marijuana and cocaine, were said to cause blacks and Mexicans to attack whites. Furthermore, opium was said to cause Asians to exhibit the same behavior. Of course, like then and now , whites consumed more drugs than any other race and every other race is disproportionally imprisoned."

amason1100 profile image

amason1100 Hub Author 4 months ago

Also, since only 14% of the drug users are black yet 65% (give or take a few percentage points) of those imprisoned for drug possession or use are black I would say there is a very clear racial bias in the war on what you put in your body... I mean the war drugs.

amason1100 profile image

amason1100 Hub Author 4 months ago

Thanks everyone. Yes, Big Pharma, definitely plays a role in lobbying to keep drugs illegal along with the "Industrial Prison Complex" which were also big players in preventing the decriminalization of marijuana here in California.

ib radmasters profile image

ib radmasters 4 months ago

Amason

The drugs and the drug users run through the spectrum of society. From the poor to the very rich. Different drugs and different people.

It is sort of like tobacco users, and I would also include alcohol.

I would say that it is more class based than race base. Although there are probably more blacks and browns in the poor class. So in that sense it could be deemed racist.

The higher the class the less the punishment, and that would also be discriminatory.

my opinion

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working